Reading Blog #1

In A Glitch Studies Manifesto, Rosa Menkman argues that technological errors hold profound aesthetic value precisely because they defy a machine's intended function. Menkman argues that a computer glitch functions much like a fingerprint. It’s an unrepeatable mark that imparts a distinct sense of individuality to an otherwise standardized product. Through this lens, mechanical errors take on an almost "human" quality, offering artists an unprompted, expressive medium born from system failure. Menkman criticizes the tech industries inclination to constantly refine and update modern technology, rendering older tech obsolete and glitches less and less common. Menkman argues that digital and mixed-media artists should embrace older technology that has the capability to glitch as it is an underrated, dying art that represents a powerful and compelling topic.

Menkman essentially frames the glitch as an act of mechanical rebellion, and an expression of individuality from an unexpected subject. I find this concept deeply compelling not only because the concept is relatable and highlights many parallels between humankind and artificial intelligence, but also because it inspires lots of new ideas for me revolving around technology possessing some sort of sentience or soul. The concept of technology having a conscience and exploring the human world, or interacting with humans who use technology for everyday life is a compelling and largely unexplored narrative for me.